How Eastern Long Lions Basketball Became Hong Kong's Top Professional Team
I still remember the first time I walked into the Eastern Long Lions training facility back in 2018. The energy was palpable, but the organization felt like
As I sit here watching the NCAA Tournament projections fluctuate daily, I can't help but focus on one burning question that's been dominating sports conversations across Arkansas: Will the Razorbacks men's basketball team hear their name called on Selection Sunday? Having followed college basketball for over two decades, I've developed a sixth sense for tournament bubbles, and this Arkansas squad has me genuinely perplexed. They're like that puzzle you can't quite solve, showing flashes of brilliance one moment and concerning inconsistency the next.
The reference to Lastimosa and the Hotshots' first-quarter struggle against the Bolts, where they managed only seven points, resonates deeply when I watch these Razorbacks. I've seen Arkansas put up similar scoring droughts that make me want to scream at my television. Remember that ugly stretch against Tennessee where they went nearly eight minutes without a field goal? Or the Missouri game where they scored just nine points in the first twelve minutes? Those are the kinds of moments that haunt teams come tournament selection time. The committee notices these offensive collapses, and they stick in evaluators' minds like bad tattoos.
What fascinates me about this team is their Jekyll-and-Hyde nature. When they're good, they're championship-level good – just look at their dominant 88-73 victory over Duke back in November. But when they're bad, they're first-quarter-Hotshots bad. Their defense can be absolutely suffocating, holding opponents to just 68.4 points per game, but then their offense disappears for stretches that make you wonder if they forgot how to shoot. I've tracked their scoring droughts this season, and they've had six games where they failed to score for four minutes or longer. That's concerning for any team with tournament aspirations.
Their non-conference performance gave me genuine hope early on. They went 11-2 with quality wins that should weigh heavily in their favor. But SEC play has been a different beast entirely. The conference is brutally tough this year, with maybe six or seven teams having legitimate tournament claims. Arkansas finds themselves in that dangerous middle ground – good enough to beat anyone on their day, but inconsistent enough to lose to teams they have no business losing to. I was at the Kentucky game last month, and the energy in Bud Walton Arena was electric. They played with an intensity I haven't seen since the 1990s, but then they followed it up with that head-scratching loss to Vanderbilt.
From my perspective, the key will be how they finish these last few regular season games. They're sitting at 18-11 overall with a 7-9 conference record as of yesterday, which puts them squarely on the bubble. The analytics love them more than the eye test does – they're ranked 28th in KenPom and have a NET ranking of 32. Those numbers typically translate to a tournament team, but I've seen teams with better metrics get left out because of bad losses. Their 2-7 record against Quad 1 opponents worries me, but their perfect 12-0 record against Quad 3 and 4 teams at least shows they're taking care of business against inferior competition.
What gives me hope is their coaching. Eric Musselman has been here before, and he knows what it takes to get teams over the hump. I've followed his career since his Nevada days, and the man can coach in March. His tournament record speaks for itself. The players seem to believe in him, and when tournament pressure mounts, that coach-player trust becomes invaluable. Still, I worry about their perimeter shooting – they're hitting just 32.1% from three-point range, which ranks them 287th nationally. That's not just bad; that's potentially tournament-bid-killing bad in today's pace-and-space game.
The comparison to Lastimosa's Hotshots team keeps coming back to me. Both teams have tremendous talent but suffer from these inexplicable scoring lapses that leave fans and analysts scratching their heads. For Arkansas, it's not just about making shots – it's about maintaining offensive flow and not settling for contested jumpers early in the shot clock. I've charted their possessions, and when they move the ball with purpose, they're a different team altogether. But when they fall into isolation-heavy offense, they become predictable and easier to defend.
Looking at their remaining schedule, I think they need to win at least two of their last three regular season games and then pick up a victory or two in the SEC Tournament to feel comfortable. The margin for error is razor-thin, and every possession matters more now than it did in November. The committee will be watching how they finish, not just how they started. Teams that peak in February and March typically get the benefit of the doubt over teams that fade down the stretch.
My gut feeling? I think they'll sneak in as one of the last four teams, probably playing in the First Four in Dayton. They have just enough quality wins and the metrics are strong enough to overcome some of those bad losses. But I've been wrong before – remember 2019 when I thought Texas would definitely make it? The selection committee can be unpredictable, and Arkansas has put themselves in this precarious position through inconsistent play. Still, when I watch this team at their best, I see a group that could win a game or two in the tournament. They have the athletes, they have the coaching, and they have the potential. Now they just need to prove they belong.